Mission committee or mission officer
Follows the mission internally, reviews actions and produces observations in the mission report.
Provide an independent conclusion on the implementation of the social and environmental objectives included in the company’s mission.

Verification does not assess the ambition of the mission. It independently examines how the company implements its statutory objectives and the results it can demonstrate. The engagement combines understanding the model, document review, interviews and evidence analysis.
Understand applicable requirements, substantiate results and obtain an independent opinion on the implementation of mission objectives.
Have the implementation of statutory social and environmental objectives verified under the framework applicable to purpose-driven companies.
Compare announced actions with committed resources, monitored indicators and results that can actually be supported.
Provide management and the mission committee with documented findings and an understanding of where further evidence is needed.
Share a substantiated conclusion prepared by an independent third-party body with stakeholders.
Each engagement starts with the social and environmental objectives stated in the articles of association. Their wording, implementation and the reporting period determine the work performed.
Internal mission oversight and external verification serve different purposes. They complement rather than replace one another.
Follows the mission internally, reviews actions and produces observations in the mission report.
Performs its own procedures: interviews, review of the mission report, testing and examination of evidence.
Describes the procedures and provides an objective-by-objective assessment, separate from the internal report.
Our approach combines an understanding of the business, an analysis of its objectives and evidence-based checks, including on-site work where appropriate.
Understand the business, articles of association, purpose and objectives; establish scope, timing and applicable criteria.
Review operational objectives, action plans, accountabilities and performance indicators for each statutory commitment.
Review the mission report and speak with management, relevant teams and the mission committee or officer; consult other stakeholders where necessary.
Perform data tests, sampling, reconciliation and supporting-document checks, with on-site work where appropriate.
Consider resources, results and shortcomings, followed by an independent review of the verification file where required.
Document the procedures and conclusion on fulfilment of statutory objectives and report the findings to the company.
For every statutory objective, the independent verifier compares what was intended, what was implemented and what can be substantiated by the end of the period.
The statutory aim connects to understandable operational commitments and the company’s real activities.
Actions, decisions, resources and responsibilities are assessed against the objective and business context.
Indicators and outputs are reconciled with source data, supporting records and findings.
Outcomes, evidence limitations and unfulfilled objectives are factored into the formal opinion.
The opinion does not replace mission management. It offers an independent, documented assessment of the implementation of statutory objectives.
Clarify which actions were taken and which results have been demonstrated.
Understand the basis of the assessment, supporting material and any limitations.
Provide management, employees and other stakeholders with an evidence-based view of progress.
It examines implementation of the statutory social and environmental objectives over the period concerned, based on resources committed, reported results and available evidence.
Structured preparation greatly facilitates the engagement: objectives, indicators, results, evidence, governance and mission committee report.
The verification engagement must preserve the independent third-party body’s independence. Any other services must therefore be organised to avoid conflict with the verifier role.
The engagement results in a reasoned opinion on the implementation of statutory objectives. Findings and evidence reviewed are documented as part of the engagement.
No. The committee or officer monitors implementation internally, while the independent third party conducts its own procedures and issues a separate reasoned opinion.
No. Quantified results are useful, but verification also assesses actions, resources, qualitative evidence and consistency with each statutory objective.
The most recent opinion accompanies the mission committee report and is published on the company’s website, where it must remain publicly accessible for at least five years under the applicable rules.
We can define the assignment scope, applicable criteria, timetable and required information with you.
Talk to EXPO’STATFor a statutory objective, verification considers commitments, actions taken, selected indicators and supporting documentation. Evidence is assessed in context and informs the independent third party’s reasoned opinion.